New York Times Calls for repeal!
Repeal Prohibition, Again
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
It took 13 years for the United States to come to its senses
and end Prohibition, 13 years in which people kept drinking, otherwise
law-abiding citizens became criminals and crime syndicates arose and
flourished. It has been more than 40 years since Congress passed the
current ban on marijuana, inflicting great harm on society just to
prohibit a substance far less dangerous than alcohol.
The federal government should repeal the ban on marijuana.
We reached that conclusion after a great deal of discussion
among the members of The Times’s Editorial Board, inspired by a rapidly
growing movement among the states to reform marijuana laws.
There are no perfect answers to people’s legitimate concerns
about marijuana use. But neither are there such answers about tobacco
or alcohol, and we believe that on every level — health effects, the
impact on society and law-and-order issues — the balance falls squarely
on the side of national legalization. That will put decisions on whether
to allow recreational or medicinal production and use where it belongs —
at the state level.
We considered whether it would be best for Washington to
hold back while the states continued experimenting with legalizing
medicinal uses of marijuana, reducing penalties, or even simply
legalizing all use. Nearly three-quarters of the states have done one of
these.
But that would leave their citizens vulnerable to the whims
of whoever happens to be in the White House and chooses to enforce or
not enforce the federal law.
The social costs of the marijuana laws are vast. There were
658,000 arrests for marijuana possession in 2012, according to F.B.I.
figures,
compared with 256,000 for cocaine, heroin and their derivatives. Even
worse, the result is racist, falling disproportionately on young black
men, ruining their lives and creating new generations of career
criminals.
There is honest debate among scientists about the health
effects of marijuana, but we believe that the evidence is overwhelming
that addiction and dependence are relatively minor problems, especially
compared with alcohol and tobacco. Moderate use of marijuana does not
appear to pose a risk for otherwise healthy adults. Claims that
marijuana is a gateway to more dangerous drugs are as fanciful as the
“Reefer Madness” images of murder, rape and suicide.
There are legitimate concerns about marijuana on the
development of adolescent brains. For that reason, we advocate the
prohibition of sales to people under 21.
Creating systems for regulating manufacture, sale and
marketing will be complex. But those problems are solvable, and would
have long been dealt with had we as a nation not clung to the decision
to make marijuana production and use a federal crime.
In coming days, we will publish articles by members of the
Editorial Board and supplementary material that will examine these
questions. We invite readers to offer their ideas, and we will report
back on their responses, pro and con.
We recognize that this Congress is as unlikely to take
action on marijuana as it has been on other big issues. But it is long
past time to repeal this version of Prohibition.
The same goes for New Zealand.
The only people making money out of it are the lawyers, the prisons and the cops who are not trained in social problems and rely solely on statistics and their own personal preferences and observations.
The problems in New Zealand with New Zealand with marijuana are a result of its illegality and would disappear overnight if marijuana was legalised.
There is also another problem with the rooting compound and the gentic disorders that are about to start showing up sometime soon.