WASHINGTON — The
Federal Reserve cut interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point on
Wednesday, its second cut since late July, and suggested it was
prepared to move aggressively if the United States economy shows
additional signs of weakening.
For
now, a growing number of Fed officials expect just one more cut this
year, based on economic projections released following the meeting, in
line with investor and economist expectations.
Fed
Chair Jerome H. Powell, speaking at a news conference said that the
United States economy remains strong and unemployment is low but that
“there are risks to this positive outlook.” If the economy weakens, a
“more extensive” series of rate cuts would be appropriate, he said.
“Our eyes are open, we’re watching the situation,” Mr. Powell said, explaining that the Fed will stop cutting rates to sustain the expansion “when we think we’ve done enough.”
Advertisement
“There may come a time when the economy weakens and we would have to cut more aggressively,” he said. “We don’t know.”
The Fed’s announcement on Wednesday did little to appease President Trump, who has been pushing the central bank to cut interest rates to zero
— or even into negative territory. The Fed’s policy interest rate is
now set in a range of 1.75 to 2 percent, and not a single official sees
it falling lower than 1.5 to 1.75 percent through the end of 2022.
- You have 2 free articles remaining.
“Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve Fail Again,” Mr. Trump said in a tweet shortly after the Fed’s announcement. “No ‘guts,’ no sense, no vision! A terrible communicator!”
Stocks,
which were down slightly before the announcement, fell further
afterward. Shortly before 2:30 p.m., the S&P 500 index was down 0.7
percent and the Nasdaq was down 1 percent. The yield on the 10-year
Treasury note was down on the day, at roughly 1.77 percent.
The
Fed’s decision-making has been complicated by mixed economic signals.
While risks cloud the horizon, economic data remain solid, creating a
complicated backdrop. Businesses are hiring and consumers are spending,
but Mr. Trump’s trade war and prospects of an unruly British withdrawal
from the European Union have markets on edge. Inflation has been stuck below the Fed’s 2 percent target, giving officials room to lower rates without worrying about runaway price gains.
Advertisement
Mr.
Powell said the decision to cut rates stemmed from a need to guard
against “some notable developments” and “ongoing risks.” Mr. Powell said
trade uncertainty and geopolitical tensions necessitated action.
“Since
the middle of last year, the global growth outlook has weakened,” Mr.
Powell said. “Trade policy tensions have waxed and waned,” and “elevated
uncertainty” is weighing on business investment and exports, he said.
In its official statement after its meeting,
the Fed said policymakers “will continue to monitor the implications of
incoming information for the economic outlook and will act as
appropriate to sustain the expansion.”
While
the median Fed official expects rates to stay at the current level
through the end of the year, seven of 17 expect another rate cut. Not a
single official expected three rate cuts in 2019 when the central bank
last released economic projections in June, suggesting that momentum is
shifting toward additional accommodation.
Mr.
Powell addressed that shift, saying the change in the Fed’s policy
stance over the course of the year is “the main takeaway.”
But
officials are increasingly divided over what happens next. Three
members of the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee dissented in
this month’s vote. James Bullard, the president of the Federal Reserve
Bank of St. Louis, wanted a more drastic half-point rate cut and voted
against moving by just a quarter point. Esther George, who heads the
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas, and Eric Rosengren, who heads the
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, thought that the central bank should
keep borrowing costs steady. Ms. George and Mr. Rosengren also voted
against the July rate cut.
Advertisement
Mr. Powell acknowledged the divisions, calling it “a time of difficult judgments” but saying he welcomed “diverse perspectives.”
He added that the bulk of the committee is going “meeting by meeting.”
The dissents underscore the economic and political challenges facing the Fed.
While
the Fed operates independently of the White House and answers to
Congress, Mr. Trump has made a regular habit of criticizing Mr. Powell
and his colleagues.
“The Federal Reserve should get our interest rates down to ZERO, or less,” Mr. Trump tweeted
on Sept. 11. “It is only the naïveté of Jay Powell and the Federal
Reserve that doesn’t allow us to do what other countries are already
doing.”
Officials regularly say they
set policy with an eye to the longer-term economic outlook, not
short-term political concerns, but Mr. Trump’s onslaught creates an
optics problem for the Fed. Some share of the population could see rate
cuts, like Wednesday’s, as a sign that the central bank is caving to
political pressure, particularly given that it was not a unanimous
decision.
But there is an economic
rationale for lowering rates sooner rather than later, since doing so
could keep credit flowing, helping to keep consumer and business
spending as uncertainty climbs.
Why the Fed Lowered Interest Rates Again
The
Federal Reserve lowered interest rates for the second time this year,
as it tries to guard the United States economy against trade-related
uncertainty and slowing global growth.
The
University of Michigan consumer sentiment index has drifted lower
recently on the back of trade concerns, and jitters about the United
States economy were also reflected in the Business Roundtable’s C.E.O.
Economic Outlook Index, which declined to a three-year low in the third
quarter.
Advertisement
Chief
executives of the nation’s largest corporations have sharply lowered
their plans for capital investment and their expectations for sales.
Trade tensions were cited as a major factor for the worry that companies
are feeling.
At the same time,
employers are still hiring, wages are gradually rising and Americans in
their prime have been coming back into the labor force. As households
take home better paychecks, their spending is holding up, fueling strong
retail sales. Even the housing market, which has struggled this year,
shows signs of firming.
But global
risks abound. Germany seems to be teetering on the brink of recession.
Britain’s exit from the European Union remains fraught, and the United
States’ trade war with China is dragging on.
Mr.
Trump has placed tariffs on $360 billion worth of Chinese goods and
plans to impose levies on nearly all Chinese imports by the end of the
year. While the two nations are back at the negotiating table, it is
unclear whether and when a deal could be reached.
The
Fed has also struggled to coax inflation up to its 2 percent goal. The
central bank aims for steady inflation that is low enough to allow for
consumer comfort but high enough to leave policymakers extra headroom to
cut interest rates, which include price gains, during a downturn.
Inflation came in at 1.6 percent in July, based on the Fed’s preferred gauge, and has been mired below its target for years. Inflation expectations, as measured by one New York Fed survey, have slipped both in the short- and the longer-term.
Advertisement
The
Fed also lowered the rate of interest it pays on reserves — money
commercial banks park at the central bank — to 1.8 percent, 0.2
percentage point below the top of the Fed’s preferred range. That
technical tweak is meant to keep the Fed funds rate, which has been
creeping up, anchored within its range.
It
also directed the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s trading desk to
execute open market transactions as necessary and “until instructed
otherwise,” to keep short-term lending rates from rising above the Fed’s
target.
The move came after several days of wild activity in an important corner of financial markets.
The
overnight rate on Treasury repurchase agreements, which are short-term
loans used by financial institutions like hedge funds and banks, surged
at the start of the week amid a shortage of dollars. A few technical factors
seemed to contribute to the spike — including a corporate tax date,
recent government bond issuance that sopped up cash and the aftereffects
of the Fed’s shrinking of its balance sheet.
The
jump pushed up the Fed’s key policy tool, the Fed funds rate, and
forced the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to spring into action to
keep it in line, a first since 2008.
Alan Rappeport contributed reporting from Washington and Matt Phillips from New York.
Most Popular
- Can the N.F.L. Turn a 360-Pound Rugby Player Into a Football Star?
- California’s Luxury Dining Circuit: Delicious and Dull
- More and More Children Are Feeling Anxious. This Graphic Novelist Is Trying to Help.
- Opinion: Something Special Is Happening in Rural America
- Trump to Revoke California’s Authority to Set Stricter Auto Emissions Rules
- Opinion: Barack Obama’s Biggest Mistake
- What Really Brought Down the Boeing 737 Max?
- Andrew Yang Knows You May Disagree With Him About Shane Gillis
- The Office: An In-Depth Analysis of Workplace User Behavior
- After Tight Israeli Election, Netanyahu’s Tenure Appears Perilous
Advertisement
Subscribe for just $1 a week. Ends soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment