Sunday, October 28, 2012

here is one for the pissant wannabees at thestandard

1. what is in the interest of SIGINT is in the interest of the state
2. absolute secrecy is in the interest of SIGINT
3. therefore absolute secrecy on the subject of SIGINT is in the interest of the state.
which premise is false?

no good asking the nitwits at the standard.
they got tight underpants and the morals of schoollteachers.
dont do that.
they too busy patting themselves on the back because of whatever fon tthey selected or some other nonsense or perhaps some sub rosa beltway argument that only they know about.
you know.
like real working class.

No comments:

now for something completely different...